Isolation and prevalence of microplastic contamination in Seabass (Lates calcarifer) from the Bay of Bengal
- Authors
-
-
Israt Nur Suravi
Department of Coastal and Marine Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.Author -
Md. Shahidul Islam
Department of Coastal and Marine Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.Author -
Mafia Akter
Department of Coastal and Marine Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.Author -
Thorna Rani Das
Department of Coastal and Marine Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.Author -
Labanna Rahman
Department of Coastal and Marine Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.Author -
Md. Shumon Mia
Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, BangladeshAuthor -
Md. Aktaruzzaman
Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Marine Fisheries and Technology Station, Cox’s Bazar-4700, Bangladesh.Author
-
- Keywords:
- Muscle, gastrointestinal tract, microplastics, potential human health impact
- Abstract
-
The detrimental effects that microplastics (MPs) have on marine life have made them a serious issue as aquatic pollutants. This study looks at the presence and attributes of MPs in the muscle and digestive systems of 25 sea bass (Lates calcarifer) from the Bay of Bengal. MPs were detected in 88% of the fish that were analyzed, indicating that the area is heavily polluted. Several nets were used to catch sea bass weighing between 170 and 310.8 g. MPs counts rose with fish size, from 11.2±4.6 and 0.4±0.5 (T1:122-200 g) to 64.2±3.8 and 20.6±1.1 (T5:299-328 g) particles per individual for sea bass muscle and gastrointestinal tracts (GIT), respectively. Of the six colors of MPs found, the most common in the seabass's GIT and muscle were green (34.1% and 33%) and blue (31.6% and 27%). In the sea bass's muscle (91%) and GIT (94.9%), fibers were the most common form of microplastic. The majority of MPs were less than 500 µm, accounting for 76% of the fish's GIT and 79% of its muscle, respectively. Polyamide and polyethylene made up the majority of MPs, according to FTIR studies, with minor levels of polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl pyrrolidone. The significant concentration of MPs discovered in a fish species that is essential to the fisheries emphasizes the need for environmental and health remedies. According to the study's findings, MPs are common in fish, and further research is needed to identify the factors influencing the incidence and risk assessment of MPs in fish in the Bay of Bengal.
- Author Biographies
- References
-
1. Andrady AL (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62: 1596–1605.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030
2. Azad, S.M.O., Towatana, P., Pradit, S., Patricia, B.G., Hue, H.T., 2018. Ingestion of Microplastics by Some Commercial Fishes in the Lower Gulf of Thailand: A Preliminary Approach to Ocean Conservation.
3. Barboza LGA, Vethaak AD, Lavorante B.R, Lundebye AK, Guilhermino L (2018) Marine microplastic debris: an emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health. Marine Pollution Bulletin 133: 336–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.047
4. Bhuyan MS (2022) Effects of microplastics on fish and in human health. Front. Environmental Science 10(827289): 10-3389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.827289
5. Bissen R, Chawchai S (2020) Microplastics on beaches along the eastern Gulf of Thailand—a preliminary study. Marine Pollution Bulletin 157: 111345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111345
6. Boerger CM, Lattin GL, Moore SL, Moore CJ (2010) Plastic ingestion by planktivorous fishes in the North Pacific Central Gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60(12): 2275–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.007
7. Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s
8. Canesi L, Ciacci C, Bergami E, Monopoli MP, Dawson KA, Papa S, Canonico B, Corsi I (2015) Evidence for immunomodulation and apoptotic processes induced by cationic polystyrene nanoparticles in the hemocytes of the marine bivalve Mytilus. Marine Environmental Research 111: 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.06.008
9. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2016). Marine Debris: Understanding, Preventing and Mitigating the Significant Adverse Impacts on Marine and Coastal Biodiversity. Technical Series No. 83.
10. Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE (2019) Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental science and technology 53(12): 7068-7074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01517
11. Crawford, C. B. & Quinn, B. (2017). Microplastic Pollutants. Elsevier 320pp. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lemos B, Ren H (2017) Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Science Report 7:1– https://www.nature.com/articles/srep46687
12. Deudero S, Alomar C (2015) Mediterranean marine biodiversity under threat: reviewing influence of marine litter on species. Marine Pollution Bulletin 98 (1–2): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.012
13. Fendall LS, Sewell MA (2009) Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58: 1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025
14. Gago J, Carretero O, Filgueiras A, Viñas L (2018) Synthetic microfibers in the marine environment: A review on their occurrence in seawater and sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 127:365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.070
15. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M (2012) Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 3060-3075. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2031505
16. Hossain MS, Sobhan F, Uddin MN, Sharifuzzaman SM, Chowdhury SR., Sarker S, Chowdhury MSN (2019) Microplastics in fishes from the Northern Bay of Bengal. Science of the Total Environment 690: 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.065
17. Ivar do Sul JAI, Costa MF (2014) The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment. Environmental Pollution 185: 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.036
18. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science (Wash.DC) 347:768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
19. Karami A, Golieskardi A, Choo CK, Romano N, Ho YB, Salamatinia B (2017) A high-performance protocol for extraction of microplastics in fish. Science of the Total Environment 578:485-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.213
20. Klangnurak W, Chunniyom S (2020) Screening for microplastics in marine fish of Thailand: the accumulation of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of different foraging preferences. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27:27161–27168. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-09147-8
21. Li J, Lusher A, Rotchell JM, Company SD, Turra A, Bråtec ILN, Sun C, Hossain MS, Li Q, Kolandhasamy P, Shi H (2018) Using mussel as a global bioindicator of coastal microplastic pollution. Environmental Pollution 244: 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.032
22. Li J, Yang D, Li L, Jabeen K, Shi H (2015) Microplastics in commercial bivalves from China. Environmental Pollution 207: 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.018
23. Lusher AL, McHugh M, Thompson RC (2013) Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Marine Pollution Bulletin 67(1–2): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.028
24. Lusher, A., Hollman, P. & Mendoza-Hill, J. (2017). Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture: Status of knowledge on their occurrence and implications for aquatic organisms and food safety. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 615. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 147 pp.
25. Mathew, G. (2009). Taxonomy, identification and biology of Seabass (Lates calcarifer).
http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/id/eprint/6062
26. Mazid, M. A. (2002). Development of Fisheries in Bangladesh World Bank, DANIDA, USAID, FAO, DFID, 2003. Fisheries Sector Review and Future Development.
27. Naidoo T, Glassom D (2019) Decreased growth and survival in small juvenile fish, after chronic exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic. Marine Pollution Bulletin 145: 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.037
28. Neves D, Sobral P, Ferreira JL, Pereira T (2015) Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin 101(1): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.008
29. Prata JC (2018) Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health? Environmental Pollution 234:115–26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043
30. Prata JC, da Costa JP, Lopes I, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T (2020) Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Science of the Total Environment 702: 134455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455
31. Ryan PG, Moore CJ, van Franeker JA, Moloney CL (2009) Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364: 1999–2012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0207
32. Sana SS, Dogiparthi LK, Gangadhar L, Chakravorty A, Abhishek N (2020) Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on marine environment and human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(36): 44743-44756. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-10573-x
33. Savoca S, Capillo G, Mancuso M, Bottari T, Crupi R, Branca C, Romano V, Faggio C, D'Angelo G, Spanò N (2019) Microplastics occurrence in the tyrrhenian waters and in the gastrointestinal tract of two congener species of seabreams. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 67: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.01.011
34. Srisiri S, Haetrakul T, Dunbar SG, Chansue N (2024) Microplastic contamination in edible marine fishes from the upper Gulf of Thailand. Marine pollution bulletin 198: 115785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115785
35. Thushari GGN, Senevirathna JDM, Yakupitiyage A, Chavanich S (2017) Effects of microplastics on sessile invertebrates in the eastern coast of Thailand: an approach to coastal zone conservation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 124(1): 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.010
36. Toussaint B, Raffael B, Angers-Loustau A, Gilliland D, Kestens V, Petrillo M (2019) Review of micro-and nanoplastic contamination in the food chain. Food Addit Contam 36: 639–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2019.1583381
37. Wang J, Liu XH, Liu GN, Zhang ZX, Wu H, Cui BS, Bai JH, Zhang W (2019) Size effect of polystyrene microplastics on sorption of phenanthrene and nitrobenzene. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf, 173: 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.037
38. Wang Y, Zou X, Peng C, Qiao S, Wang T, Yu W, Khokiattiwong S, Kornkanitnan N (2020) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in surface sediments from the Gulf of Thailand. Marine Pollution Bulletin 152: 110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110916
39. Wright SL, Kelly FJ (2017) Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environmental Science and Technology 51:
6634–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00423
40. Yang X, Man YB, Wong MH, Owen RB, Chow KL (2022) Environmental health impacts of microplastics exposure on structural organization levels in the human body. Science of the total environment 154025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154025
41. Zhao S, Zhu L, Li D (2016) Microscopic anthropogenic litter in terrestrial birds from Shanghai, China: not only plastics but
also natural fibers. Science of The Total Environment 550: 1110–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.112
42. Ziajahromi S, Kumar A, Neale PA, Leusch FDL (2017) Impact of microplastic beads and fibers on waterflea (Ceriodaphnia dubia) survival, growth, and reproduction: implications of single and mixture exposures. Environmental Science and Technology 51(22): 13397– 13406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03574
- Downloads
- Published
- 31-08-2025
- Data Availability Statement
-
"All relevant data are included in the manuscript and its supplementary files. No additional datasets were generated."
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2025 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Mikhail Siddiqui , Exploring the Role of Dark Oxygen Production in Deep-Sea Biogeochemical Cycles: Implications for Ecosystem Dynamics and Deep-Sea Mining , International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture
- Yasmine Blili, Elie Abou Nader, Iciar Pavez, Paolo Prosperi, Rachid Harbouze, Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos, Christina Kleisiari, Marios Vasileiou, Vasileios Angelopoulos, George Vlontzos, Georgios Kleftodimos, Assessing The Economic Impact of Insect Pollination on the Agricultural Sector: A Department-Level Case Study in France , International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture
- Landon Prokopinski, Aswita Kode, Ajmain Adiyan, Sanjith Sowrirajan, Marcellino Melika, Rushil Kukreja, Light Pollution and Climate Change: A Dual Approach to Sustainability , International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Research in Organic Agriculture
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.